New York Is Going to Flood. Here’s What the City Can Do to Survive. October 17th, 2025
Via New York Times, a look at New York City’s flooded future:
The waters surrounding New York allowed it to grow into an economic powerhouse. But what has been a blessing is increasingly a threat, as flooding becomes one of the city’s greatest challenges.
By 2080, nearly 30 percent of the city’s land mass could be at risk of significant flooding. Some 1.4 million New Yorkers currently live in these areas — 17 percent of the city’s population.
New York’s adaptation is a matter of survival. Climate experts have recommended several strategies. The city could increase its ability to absorb water, converting wide areas of asphalt and concrete to green space. It could fortify by building barriers along its shores, possibly even a gate around the harbor. Or it could retreat, relocating people out of the most hazardous regions.
The city will most likely have to embrace all three approaches in some form.
Sponge City
New Creek Bluebelt, Staten Island
In Staten Island, waterways have been restored and connected, adding parkland and reducing flooding in nearby neighborhoods.Erin Schaff/The New York Times
New York is experiencing extreme rainfall events with increasing frequency and intensity, according to a 2024 study in Nature.
Since 1970, the city’s stormwater system has been built to handle up to 1.75 inches of rain per hour. Hourly precipitation recorded by Central Park’s rain gauge didn’t exceed this limit until 1995. It’s been eclipsed in three of the last five years.
One major problem is how little of that rainfall is absorbed or stored before reaching the stormwater system. A whole suite of solutions focuses on building and expanding the city’s capacity to do so.
Understanding New York’s historical environment is crucial to imagining a more resilient urban future, one based on the city’s past topography, according to Eric Sanderson, a landscape ecologist and vice president for Urban Conservation Strategy at the New York Botanical Garden and the author of “Mannahatta: A Natural History of New York City.”
“I was trying to imagine a configuration of the landscape that could work with the understanding of climate change at the time,” Sanderson said of his book. “Part of that is restoring streams, wetlands and agricultural lands, connecting the urbanized parts of the city, and depaving a lot of what we have.”
He and a team of researchers have spent years reconstructing the past ecological landscape of the city, producing data that they hope will inform its future.
Rain gardens, curbside planted pits designed to siphon water away from drainage systems, and permeable pavement are already turning streets and sidewalks into sponges. And as part of its Cloudburst program, the city is designing parks and public spaces to flood intentionally, enhancing their innate ability to act as natural catch basins. The first to be completed, a basketball court in South Jamaica, Queens, recently opened.
But these initiatives are in their infancy. Only a handful of Cloudburst sites have been identified, and the need is most likely far greater: Sanderson and his team mapped out 540 potential locations.
Policymakers have offered several incentives to private property owners, making it easier for real estate developers to install green infrastructure. Similarly, waterfront properties above a certain size are now required to provide stormwater solutions.
Sewer and storage upgrades are also on the table. In Gowanus, Brooklyn, Department of Environmental Protection engineers are constructingan eight-million-gallon underground tank, redirecting water that would otherwise overwhelm the system during heavy rainstorms and cause combined sewer overflows into the Gowanus Canal.
Then there’s daylighting, in which onetime waterways, covered by buildings, pavement and landfill, are unearthed and restored, allowing floodwater to go elsewhere.
A project at Tibbetts Brook in the Bronx will test the concept. Concrete and other artificial materials will be removed to reroute water aboveground and into a dedicated underground pipe, reducing sewer overflow that ends up in the Harlem River.
A more dramatic example of leveraging the city’s natural landscape is the successful Bluebelt project in Staten Island, which strings together streams, ponds and wetlands — some natural, some engineered. It has already reduced flooding in parts of the borough.
But for greater effect, the city will have to rapidly expand this work to feasible locations.“Our imaginations have not caught up to what nature can and will do,” Sanderson said.
On a recent tour of the Staten Island Bluebelts, Rohit Aggarwala, the commissioner of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, said the agency had listed 86 “priority areas” citywide for flood mitigation. “We’re asking, ‘What is the solution for this specific place?’” he said.
That work has its hurdles, though, and not every part of the city is as spacious as Staten Island. A major overhaul of local sewer capacity in Bushwick, Brooklyn, for example, will cost $390 million and take years. Expect disruption, Aggarwala said: “The residents will be less happy when they find out how long Knickerbocker Avenue will have to be ripped up.”
But for too long, he added, the city’s work was not focused enough on the future: “We have to build for 2075, not 1975.”
Walled City
Rockaway Beach, Queens
Under the sand dunes, a seven-mile wall of steel, concrete and stone provides protection from storm surge and beach erosion.Erin Schaff/The New York Times
The challenges of fortifying the coast against storm surges are deeply informed by the same geographic features that helped New York grow: It’s a cluster of islands, with a large harbor at the mouth of an ocean.
After Hurricane Sandy, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers developed and assessed different options for protecting the New York-New Jersey Harbor region from future storm surge.
A burnt orange shading covering large parts of a map of the city and New Jersey, mainly on the edges.
First, they estimated the area at risk from storm surge in 2095, using a moderate projection of sea level rise.
A black line appears on some parts of the borders of New York and New Jersey.
After a cost-benefit analysis, the Army Corps tentatively selected an option that would include a series of barriers strategically placed to protect certain areas.
A burnt orange shading appears on parts of the coastline, sometimes overlapping with a black line.
Though it would cost an estimated $53 billion and take 14 years to construct, this proposal would leave 37 percent of the area at risk unprotected, and potentially affect waterfront views.
A view from a grassy shore of the Oosterscheldekering, a large barrier stretching toward a body of water.
A more ambitious option would include a huge storm surge barrier with retractable sea gates, stretching over six miles across the mouth of the harbor. A similar barrier has protected the Netherlands since 1986.
The Oosterscheldekering in the Netherlands
A pastel green shading on a map covering large stretches of New Jersey and New York City’s coastline.
This approach would result in 96 percent of the study area being protected, but would come with a price tag of $119 billion, according to the Army Corps of Engineers’ estimate.
The New York Times
It’s worth noting that opinions vary on almost every aspect of the Army Corps’ plans, including the actual amount of protection achieved, its environmental effect, timelines and price tags.
Still, some projects have come to fruition. Along the Rockaway Peninsula, where Hurricane Sandy slammed beachfront communities, the Army Corps built sand dunes that double as seawalls. On Staten Island’s South Shore, which was also devastated by the storm, construction started this year on a $2.3 billion coastal flooding protection project, with the federal government picking up most of the cost.
In Lower Manhattan, East River and Wagner Parks have been raised so residents there are protected from another Sandy, at least in the near future. Similar work is underway at nearby Battery Park. (Not incidentally, all three parks are built partly or entirely on landfill.)
The first flood gates have emerged on the East Side, designed to clamp into place when a storm is in sight. Will that be enough?
“It feels a little bit like we’re tinkering,” said Kate Orff, the founder of SCAPE, a landscape architecture and design firm. “Is it possible to have all the solutions at once? I’m not sure.”
Orff has been battling with the how and when for some time. Her project on Staten Island, called “living breakwaters,” submerged stone and concrete off 2,400 feet of coast. The marine life that has returned help break waves and stifle erosion — a natural wall.
“True, successful adaptation is something that’s hard to recognize, applaud and see,” she said in her downtown office, with the East River behind her. “It’s avoided damage, trauma and loss. Adaptation is, in a sense, invisible.”
Ghost City
Hunter’s Point, Queens
Waterfront development continues in areas threatened by flooding.Erin Schaff/The New York Times
If the solutions centered around absorption and fortification aren’t sufficient, what’s left is the daunting prospect of moving people. Hurricane Ida felt like a wake-up call when it arrived in 2021 and drowned at least 13 people, mostly in basement-level apartments in Queens and Brooklyn.Some 80,000 homes in the New York area are projected to flood over the next 15 years. How do you relocate those people, and the 1.4 million in New York’s floodplain who could be at risk by 2080, to safer places?
A housing shortage complicates matters further. The city has a goal of adding 500,000 new homes by 2032, and there are ideas about how to make that happen. The balancing act of both future protection and construction poses an almost existential challenge.
With about 29,000 people per square mile, New York is the country’s most densely populated major city, which makes moving people out of harm’s way particularly expensive and challenging to implement.
New York’s crowding problem clearly stands out if we visualize its population density in 3-D. Taller bars represent more people, and the populationat risk of future flooding is highlighted.
Though Hurricane Sandy led to a short-lived buyout program, mostly on Staten Island, that offered financial assistance for those willing to move out of harm’s way, developers continue to build in areas prone to flooding. Elsewhere, the storm sparked a crisis of faith in the continued existence of coastal areas like the Rockaways, although most declined to leave.
“There’s a lot of PTSD that I see from friends and family there,” said Amy Chester, director of Rebuild by Design, which oversaw a $1 billion design competition for post-Sandy resiliency projects. “But people make decisions on their own timelines. It takes a while.”
In past classes at Pratt Institute, Chester invited college students to dream of a city where elevation guides density. The prompt: Don’t just retreat to higher ground; build there. “If we were going to identify these areas to keep people in New York City, what would that look like?” Chester asked.
The results of Chester’s class were renderings of floodproof towers in communities like Kissena Park and College Point. But the setting could be anywhere notably above sea level.
“Brooklyn’s a really good example,” Chester said. “It has an obvious spine of the areas that are higher up. Just look by the name of what’s considered high and low: Brooklyn Heights, Prospect Heights, Crown Heights.”
But what will convince people to move there, especially longtime residents? For years, the city has discussed a more extensive voluntary buyout program. Homes then could be swapped out for parks, infrastructure or flood-proof developments. A pilot program, started this year, will focus on a low-lying neighborhood in Southern Queens informally known as “the hole.”
As the city’s chief climate officer, Aggarwala is probably asked the central question more than most: Will New York City as we know it survive? One thing he often reminds himself is that the city is capable of big things.
Standing in front of a soon-to-open daylighted wetland along a quiet street on Staten Island, he paused, thinking through what to say next. “But the question that really keeps me up at night,” he said, “is whether we have the political will and ambition to actually get this stuff done.”
This entry was posted on Friday, October 17th, 2025 at 5:41 am and is filed under River Flooding, Sea Level Rise. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Comments are closed.
ABOUT
Black Swans / Green Shoots examines the collision between urbanization and resource scarcity in a world affected by
climate change, identifying opportunities to build sustainable cities and resilient infrastructure through the use
of revolutionary capital, increased awareness, innovative technologies, and smart design to make a difference in the
face of global and local climate perils.
'Black Swans' are highly improbable events that come as a surprise, have major disruptive effects, and that are
often rationalized after the fact as if they had been predictable to begin with. In our rapidly warming world, such
events are occurring ever more frequently and include wildfires, floods, extreme heat, and drought.
'Green Shoots' is a term used to describe signs of economic recovery or positive data during a downturn. It
references a period of growth and recovery, when plants start to show signs of health and life, and, therefore, has
been employed as a metaphor for a recovering economy.
It is my hope that Black Swans / Green Shoots will help readers understand both climate-activated risk and
opportunity so that you may invest in, advise, or lead organizations in the context of increasing pressures of
global urbanization, resource scarcity, and perils relating to climate change. I believe that the tools of business
and finance can help individuals, businesses, and global society make informed choices about who and what to
protect, and I hope that this blog provides some insight into the policy and private sector tools used to assess
investments in resilient reinforcement, response, or recovery.