A Building’s Carbon Footprint Is Much Bigger Than It Looks At First Glance

Via Quartz, a look at how indirect emissions like using electricity can triple a building’s carbon footprint:

 

While buildings only contribute to 6% of global emissions, accounting for the use of more electricity and a structure’s materials can triple the size of a building’s carbon footprint, according to a new report by Generation, a sustainable investment firm. Historical data from the International Energy Association (IEA) shows that buildings haven’t made big strides in reducing their carbon footprint, remaining more or less the same since 2010. But as the energy transition points toward more electrification, using electricity efficiently will be critical to reducing emissions in the places where people live and work everyday.

The lifecycle of building emissions can be broken down into three categories: materials and construction, operational, and replacement or demolition. These phases make up 30%, 50%, and 20% of a building’s emissions, respectively, according to the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Authors of the report claim that too little attention has been paid to indirect or embedded emissions produced through sourcing materials and using electricity. Indirect emissions are different from direct emissions in that buildings themselves do not generate electricity, for example, but still consume it to function. 

Increasing demand for electricity in buildings

As more homes and commercial buildings turn to efficient LED lightsheat pumps, and solar water heating, the sourcing of their electricity should still be considered. While the electrification of buildings has the potential to put excessive new loads on the power grid, technology offers a way to avoid that outcome. In fact, the authors of the Generation reportclaim, buildings could become a major asset to the power grid, helping to balance out fluctuations in the supply of electricity as more and more renewables connect to the system.

One way to do this might be having power companies send signals to customer equipment to manage demand. California has already set the precedent for electricity demand management, where electricity providers offer opt-in rates based on real-time electricity costs. Cost-based rates incentivize customers to use electricity when the grid is cleanest—and demand is lowest.

 



This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 20th, 2023 at 3:06 am and is filed under Green Design.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  Both comments and pings are currently closed. 

Comments are closed.


ABOUT
BLACK SWANS GREEN SHOOTS
Black Swans / Green Shoots examines the collision between urbanization and resource scarcity in a world affected by climate change, identifying opportunities to build sustainable cities and resilient infrastructure through the use of revolutionary capital, increased awareness, innovative technologies, and smart design to make a difference in the face of global and local climate perils.

'Black Swans' are highly improbable events that come as a surprise, have major disruptive effects, and that are often rationalized after the fact as if they had been predictable to begin with. In our rapidly warming world, such events are occurring ever more frequently and include wildfires, floods, extreme heat, and drought.

'Green Shoots' is a term used to describe signs of economic recovery or positive data during a downturn. It references a period of growth and recovery, when plants start to show signs of health and life, and, therefore, has been employed as a metaphor for a recovering economy.

It is my hope that Black Swans / Green Shoots will help readers understand both climate-activated risk and opportunity so that you may invest in, advise, or lead organizations in the context of increasing pressures of global urbanization, resource scarcity, and perils relating to climate change. I believe that the tools of business and finance can help individuals, businesses, and global society make informed choices about who and what to protect, and I hope that this blog provides some insight into the policy and private sector tools used to assess investments in resilient reinforcement, response, or recovery.